By: Brian Evans

On Saturday, the New York Times resurrected and dusted off the ‘RESISTANCE’ anti-Trump, anti-Kavanaugh agenda, as they dug up yet another claim against now-United States Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. In fact, the Gateway Pundit reported

The Times on Saturday ran a piece in which former Yale student and Kavanaugh classmate Max Stier claimed that in the 1980s, Kavanaugh had dropped his pants at a college party, prompting others there to grab Kavanaugh’s penis and push it into the hand of a female.

The allegation originated from the yet-to-be-released book…

“The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation.”

It was written by New York Times reporters Robin Pogebrin and Kate Kelly.

Once again, the Democrats jumped on the hate-Trump, impeach, impeach, impeach bandwagon, before the allegations were even corroborated!

For example, Julian Castro, who is Obama’s former Housing and Urban Development Secretary, and now 2020 Presidential candidate, without even questioning or confirming the report, attacked Kavanaugh, stating…

Then, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), who is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and 2020 Presidential candidate stated…

Then, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and leading 2020 Presidnetial candidate stated…

Then, Beto O’Rourke (D-TX) and 2020 Presidential candidate, who already is under fire for threatening Americans, stating that he is going to come for and steal their guns, as well as tear down any existing border walls that protect the United States citizenry, joined in with the attacks shortly after, stating…

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) said he supported “any appropriate constitutional mechanism” to hold Kavanaugh accountable, but did not specify whether that meant impeachment or an investigation.

“As a federal judge who overwhelmingly sided with corporate power and Wall Street, Brett Kavanaugh should never have been nominated. Supreme Court justices are not above the law. Someone who sits in judgment over the nation should have the highest integrity,” he tweeted.

“The revelations today confirm what we already knew: During his hearing, Kavanaugh faced credible accusations and likely lied to Congress. I support any appropriate constitutional mechanism to hold him accountable,” he tweeted:

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) has not called for Kavanaugh’s impeachment, but spoke on ABC News’ This Week on Sunday about how the Justice Department would have to turn over documents of their investigation to Congress for any potential impeachment hearing.

In addition to top Democrats jumping on the hate-filled bandwagon, Progressive organizations joined in as well, according to The Hill! Organizations like The Center for Popular Democracy, the Women’s March, and Demand Justice.

However, within a few hours of the New York Times ‘bombshell report’,  Mollie Hemingway was actively investigating and validating the facts, prior to Fox News running with the story! Interestingly, Hemingway found that the New York Times had omitted one major fact, in that the original source, the alleged victim that the paper was using to attack Kavanaugh said that she had told the book authors that she doesn’t remember a thing about the alleged incident.

Within minutes of Hemingway exposing their major lapse in journalistic standards, the New York Times quickly printed a retraction! After all, they knew at that point, that they had been caught launching a false allegation, a smear campaign, against a sitting United States Supreme Court Justice, in a likely and apparent effort to taint his name, so they can diminish any rulings that he would rule on in future cases!

The New York Times correction read…

“An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book’s account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party. The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”

However, the damage control didn’t stop there for the Times! In fact, their newspapers opinion page tweeted out…

“Having a penis thrust in your face at a drunken dorm party may seem like harmless fun. But when Brett Kavanaugh did it to her, Deborah Ramirez says, it confirmed she did not belong at Yale in the first place.”

Within minutes, and as they were trying to save face on their story, they pulled the NYT Tweet, stating that…

“We have deleted an earlier tweet to this article that was poorly phrased.”

However, the situation only continued to get worse throughout the day, as not only did the alleged victim have no recollection of the incident ever happening, The Gateway Pundit reported that the accuser that was cited in the hit-piece, that they claimed to be bi-partisan, was not only a major donor to Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee, but they are a Hillary Clinton attorney as well!

The Pundit pointed to the New Yorker, who reported in September 2018, that a second woman accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh of lewd behavior some 30 years ago. They went on to note that…

Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer released the report in the New Yorker from a second woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct — and this time it included a dildo.

The 53-year-old accuser Deborah Ramirez told the New Yorker that she was initially hesitant to speak out because she was drunk at the time and her memory had gaps. She spent six days “carefully assessing her memories” and consulting with her attorney before going public.

This was amazing —During the investigation two male students who were allegedly at the party, the wife of another male student, and three other Yale classmates all told Ronan Farrow that there was NO WAY Kavanaugh assaulted Ramirez.

The New Yorker ran with the story anyway without any credible evidence …only wild 30-year-old accusations from a drunk.
It was so bad The New York Times turned the story down.
That’s pretty bad!

But the liberal media pushed the same debunked story this past weekend.

The fact that it was already debunked did not make any headlines.

Then, they pointed out how the accuser that the New York Times is using as a credible witness is none other than Max Stier, who is the President and CEO of the Partnership for Public Service!

They point out how, according to their strategic plan, the organization is designed to shift Americans from where they stand now, to…

“where they want them to be”

Therefore, they are designed to shift American’s public opinion on issues! Plus, the Pundit points out that Max Stier is a former Clinton lawyer.

After the story broke, and evidence emerged of the New York Times’ false allegations, President Trump expressed outrage, as he quoted Fox News’ Dan Bongino, stating…

He added that…

President Trump added…

Finally, on Tuesday, Fox News reported that The New York Times reporters behind the controversial piece on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh claimed Monday night that key details missing from the sexual misconduct allegation may have been removed from the original draft in the editing process.

The added that the New YorkTimes writers who published the article blamed the wording that went from showing Kavanaugh’s innocence to accusing him of violent sexual assault, on editing procedures! New York Times writer Pogrebin and O’Donnell said…

usually include names of victims and that she believed that when the editors removed the name, the crucial information that she didn’t remember was also removed.

“So I think it was just sort of an editing, you know, done in the haste in the editing process,” Pogrebin added.

“Were you involved in the decision to amend this and do the correction- the addition online to the piece?” O’Donnell followed.

“We discussed it,” Pogrebin said. “We felt like there was so much heat, there’s so much- everyone has been has been seizing on various aspects of this that we certainly didn’t want it to be an issue anymore and we certainly never intended to mislead in any way. We wanted to give as full of a story as possible.”

In other words…rather than taking responsibility for blatant libel violations, in which they misconstrued, lied about, and wrote false statements about Supreme Court Justice Bret Kavanaugh, they are choosing to shrug off the responsibility onto the editors! Albeit, the editors should have caught the error in the story, WHY WOULD POGREBIN OR O’DONNELL even write the story, knowing that there was no story in the first place? The answer, likely because they hate President Trump and anyone connected to him, appointed by him, related to him, or working for him so much, that they are willing to fabricate, rather than authenticate actual news, much like the Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, and other Mainstream Media networks of today!