By: Brian Evans
On April of 2017, Dr. Nagarwala of Michigan was arrested and charged for ‘female genital mutilation’, in as many as 100 young girls. This particular case involves minor girls from Michigan, Illinois and Minnesota, including some who cried, screamed and bled during the procedure and one who was given Valium ground in liquid Tylenol to keep her calm, according to court records. The defendants are all members of a small Indian Muslim sect known as the Dawoodi Bohra, which has a mosque in Farmington Hills. The sect practices female genital mutilation, and believes it is a religious rite of passage, and they claim it only involves a “nick,” regardless of the abundant and disturbing evidence. The defendants claim that “Congress lacked authority to enact” the genital mutilation statute, “thus the female genital mutilation charges must be dismissed.” They also argue that they didn’t actually practice FGM, but rather performed a benign procedure involving no cutting, however the facts show that the girls were cut, bled, and had their sexual genitalia mutilated for the purpose of taking away their sexual drive.
Female Genital mutilation is a relatively new practice in the United States, and is a growing problem, as Muslims immigrate to the United States, especially in areas within Michigan and Minnesota, where there are large Muslim communities emerging. The problem that is emerging involves the fact that Muslims don’t respect Constitutional law, but instead follow Sharia law, which has dark, sinister, and evil underpinnings. Currently, 27 states have laws that criminalize female genital mutilation, including Michigan, whose Female Genital Mutilation law is harsher than the federal statute, and punishable by up to 15 years in prison, compared with 5 years under federal law. It was last year, that Michigan’s passed its Female Genital Mutilation laws, and applies to both doctors who conduct the procedure, and parents who transport a child to have it done.
Under the Muslims Sharia Law, women can be beaten, tortured, forced to have sex against their will, forced to marry a much older man when they are still 12 years old, and they undergo ‘Female Genital Mutilation’, which is done between infancy and 15 years old, which comprises all procedures involving partial or total removal of the female external genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons as defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO). FGM is done to control female sexuality. They figure that if it sex hurts, or young girls can’t feel pleasure, they won’t seek out extramarital sex; thus, maintaining purity for marriage. The problem is that the procedure results many times in severe bleeding, pain, problems urinating, cysts, infections, and many times newborn death if performed at infancy. Sadly, more than 200 million women have been cut in this way, in more than 30 countries. FOR WHAT PURPOSE….To take away their sexual desire, so they are forced to save themselves for a mans pleasure.
Female Genital mutilation of girls is banned by several international treaties, but the practice continues in predominantly Muslim regions like Somalia, Egypt, and in the Middle East. However, despite the acknowledgement by the international community of its wrongful act, and more importantly, its illegality under the Constitution of the United States of America, a Michigan judge defended the barbaric practice that is done to girls, and deemed it unconstitutional to ban the act. The The Detroit Free Press reported:
In a major blow to the federal government, a judge in Detroit has declared America’s female genital mutilation law unconstitutional, thereby dismissing the key charges against two Michigan doctors and six others accused of subjecting at least nine minor girls to the cutting procedure in the nation’s first FGM case.
The historic case involves minor girls from Michigan, Illinois and Minnesota, including some who cried, screamed and bled during the procedure and one who was given Valium ground in liquid Tylenol to keep her calm, court records show.
The judge’s ruling also dismissed charges against three mothers, including two Minnesota women whom prosecutors said tricked their 7 -year-old daughters into thinking they were coming to metro Detroit for a girls’ weekend, but instead had their genitals cut at a Livonia clinic as part of a religious procedure.
U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman concluded that “as despicable as this practice may be,” Congress did not have the authority to pass the 22-year-old federal law that criminalizes female genital mutilation, and that FGM is for the states to regulate. FGM is banned worldwide and has been outlawed in more than 30 countries, though the U.S. statute had never been tested before this case.
Ironically Progressives, Socialists, and even the DNC itself has defended Sharia Law, as well as the practice, as they claim to fight for ‘pro-family policies’, and religious rights. Instead, the radical left has been actively working to undermine the Constitution, tear families apart. They try to feminize men, masculinize women, and try to take God out of the home, as they shred the family unit. Even more ironic, while Democrats have declared war on Christianity, they fight to make America embrace the Muslim religion, and call for the importation and expansion of Muslims throughout the United States, despite the fact that the Muslim religion follows Sharia Law, which is cruel and heinous to women. It is hard to understand how a Party who claims to be the Party who supports woman’s rights can also defend their fight to murder a woman’s unborn child, and support the shameful act of mutilating a woman’s body…ALL SO THEY LOSE THEIR DESIRE FOR SEX, SO THEY CAN SAVE THEMSELVES FOR THE PLEASURE OF THEIR FUTURE HUSBAND. In regards to Muslim Sharia law, a husband who many times forces them into MARRIAGE AS A CHILD, and then treats them as PROPERTY, AND NOT A HUMAN BEING! It is hard to understand how Democrats can support such inhumane acts towards women, and still call themselves the PARTY FOR WOMEN’S RIGHTS! Democrats claim to ‘defend a woman’s right to control her own body’, but they support a Muslim’s right to have young girls held down while their reproductive organs are painfully cut and shredded. They support Muslim’s refusal to give women the choice to carve out their own path in life. They support a Muslim’s choice to perform Female Genital Mutilation, simply so they won’t have sex before marriage. They support pre-pubescent young girls being raped. They support forced marriage of pre-pubescent girls with old men. Democrats support Muslim wives not having the same divorce rights as the man. They support women not being allowed leadership roles. They support women being subservient to their husbands, even if they are forced to do horrific acts that the man demands of them. They support women being deemed un-intelligent by their Muslim men, and they support the rape of female captives, and they support women being a mans property, rather than their own self.
In the end, if Democrats truly fought for women’s rights, why don’t they condemn Sharia Law throughout the world. Why do Democrats refuse to fight for the ban of Sharia Law in the United States, and fight against unconstitutional judges like US District Judge Bernard Friedman, who bring judicial activism to the bench, rather than constitutional law. After all, Sharia Law is in violation of the Constitution of the United States, as well as a violation against the humanity of mankind.
Gina Balaya, spokesperson for the U.S. Attorneys Office, said the government is reviewing the judge’s opinion and will make a determination whether or not to appeal at some point in the future.