By: Brian Evans

Monday night, Fox News Channel’s Tucker Carlson blasted the Washington Establishment Elitists who are pushing for, and trying to convince President Trump that America should go to war with Syria, to remove Bashar al-Assad. He unloaded in his opening monologue a detailed explanation of why the Establishment in Washington is wrong, and how the United States should not become mired in another war. He detailed why removing Assad, albeit tempting due to his demonic ways, would create yet another radical islamic jihadi cesspool. A conduit to train and deploy future jihadist warriors that would ultimately fight to inflict pain and suffering on not only Israel, but christians around the globe, and America and her allies.


In his opening monologue, Tucker Carlson says:

“Leaders on both sides of the aisle in Congress, in the media, in our intelligence services and virtually every over-funded think-tank in Washington have suddenly aligned tonight on a single point of agreement: America must go to war in Syria immediately. Bashar al-Assad cannot continue to lead that country. He must be overthrown.”

However, as Tucker pointed out, Assad is not a good man. In fact, Assad is a ruthless dictator who rules his nation in a heinous way, and against his own people. But, what would the consequences be if we went to war? Also, America has been uncertain about Assad’s participation in the recent attacks on his people, or if he was actually the one behind the gas attacks themselves.  Carlson, went on to say…

“Assad is an evil man they tell us,” “Assad’s poison gas suffocated children. Pictures of the aftermath of that are all over the internet and they are horrifying. Assad is a monster. That’s the official story — almost everyone in power claims to believe it.” Tucker goes on to say that… “All the geniuses tell us that Assad killed those children. But do they really know that? Of course, they don’t really know that, they’re making it up. They have no real idea what happened. Actually, both sides in the Syrian Civil War possess chemical weapons. How would it benefit Assad, from using chlorine gas last weekend?”


Therefore, as President Trump is delivered intelligence on the Syrian crisis in the Middle East, he must take note of all the motivations behind the Establishment’s push for war!

Tucker Carlson points out that…

“When you conduct foreign policy by viral video, pictures are essential.” 

Yes, pictures can be used to manipulate, and to influence people. Pictures of innocent dying children are flashed across the television sets, shown on the internet, and printed in newspapers to tug on the heartstrings of American’s, influence their opinion on policy, and gain their support for a specific action. In fact, Trump launched an airstrike against a Syrian airbase last April, in response to a gas attack that was reportedly perpetrated by the Assad regime. However, in February of this year, Secretary of Defense Mattis openly admitted that we still cannot definitively prove that the attack was carried out by the Assad regime. Was the story that was put out by the Mainstream Media and Establishment propaganda? It had the full backing of Democrats in Washington, and Republican Rino’s! It was celebrated by the mainstream media, throughout not only the United States, but throughout much of the whole of Europe. An interesting irony, since the very people who push for war with Syria, venomously attacked President Bush when he fought for, and went to war with Saddam Hussein in Iraq, for those very same reasons.

President Trump must ask the question, who is more dangerous…Assad, or the Rebels? In truth, Trump is caught in a quagmire. If the President does attack the Assad regime, the Rebels would be likely to win the war, and institute a new government. Furthermore, that new government brings about a whole new set of questions! Who are the rebels that fight against Assad? What do they want? What are their goals, beliefs, and motives? What kind of government would they install? The answer to those questions bring about more concerns, than they do answers.

Interestingly, the rebels in Syria are composed largely of islamic rebels. Islamic rebels who have subscribed to radical islamic principles and jihad. They hold an extremist belief set that America has been fighting against since before the 9/11 attacks on America. They have vowed to replace Assad’s government. Replace it with an Islamic government who wishes to exterminate all those who do not conform to the radical islamic belief-set that they fight for. They plan to eradicate the christians throughout Syria. Christians who Bashar al-Assad is currently protecting.

During the Obama Administration, President Trump tweeted:

Screen Shot 2018-04-10 at 9.45.46 AM

While it is true that President Trump has access to information that citizen Trump did not have, I and many other American’s plead with him to move forward with carefully and methodically planned steps. We ask that he consider the source of those who push for him to go to war. A group of Progressive and Fabian bureaucrats who fight for a One-World globalist agenda, and an end to the anti-Progressive Socialist Trump Administration. Luckily, President Trump and American’s throughout our nation, are fortunate to now have Defense Secretary Mattis and National Security Advisor John Bolton in place, to help filter the facts from the fiction, globalist agenda from the interests of America. Mattis and Bolton have a long and stellar history of involvement in dealing with the international community, and the consequences of war.  Citizen Trump was right to issue a warning that we should stay out of Syria. A warning that Trump expressed, in regards to his concerns that the ‘rebels’ are as bad, or possibly worse than the Assad regime. In fact, the rebels are extraordinarily worse. Their radical ideology wholeheartedly believes in the extermination of anyone who doesn’t submit to their hate filled jihadist set of beliefs. They are a group who openly calls for, and plans to abolish christianity, and annihilate christians who refuse to surrender their christian beliefs. They plan to exterminate all who refuse to submit to their radical islamic belief system. A system that encompasses intolerance,  racism, hate, and murder. Some indications even point to the possibility that the islamic rebels could be behind the gas attacks on the innocent Syrian men, women, and children. A move, if committed by the rebels, yet pinned on the Assad regime, would harden the call by the globalist world leadership to remove the one obstacle in their way…. Bashar Hafez al-Assad. Then, with Assad out-of-the-way, the radical Islamists would be able to take over Syria, and institute their radical and brutal government.

Does that mean that President Trump should not intervene in Syria? ABSOLUTELY NOT! In fact, HE PROBABLY SHOULD! President Trump should not go to war with Syria, but we should eliminate chemical weapons from Assad and from the rebels. President Trump sent a clear message during his first bombing of Syria over the use of ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’. Now, we need to continue ensuring that WND’s don’t continue to be used by Assad or the rebels. Furthermore, we have unfinished business with Assad. Before Al Qaeda in Iraq (ISIS) turned on him, Assad was funneling its suicide bombers into Iraq. Then it turned on him. In the meantime, a good number of honorable American soldiers lost their lives or were mutilated because of him.

Today, America does not need to get into the predicament of fighting radical Islamic jihad elsewhere around the globe, while enabling its expansion and advancement in Syria. As a result, President Trump has to make a critical decision. He has to determine if he wants to listen to the Globalist Establishment Elitists in Washington, who push for a war to replace a ruthless dictator, with a radical islamic regime. A regime who will exterminate christians, slaughter jews, force all who oppose their leadership to convert to Islam, or consequently die. As a result, President Trump’s decision will determine the future of Syria, and have potentially a lasting effect on the global community, and the war on terror. A decision that will either allow the islamic jihadists to flourish in Syria, or allow a ruthless dictator like Assad to remain in power.

Evans News Report