By: Brian Evans

A new study that was highlighted on taxpayer-funded NPR, stated that human beings should stop having babies, or at least not too many. It explains that the more babies human beings have, the bigger the carbon footprint. It points to greater consumption of electricity, more cars on the road, more animal product consumption that results in more animals in existence, which results in more carbon dioxide (CO2) expelled into the air, and so forth. It makes logical sense that the greater the number of humans that inhabit the planet, the greater the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions that are expended. They go even further to say that we are at the precipice of a global climate disaster. So should we exterminate parts of our population to save the remaining humans from this climate disaster? Was God so careless as to not foresee this climate apocalypse coming, or provide us with an alternative to human population extermination? To answer these questions we can actually look to the very subject that the climate change researchers utilize to show how we are a doomed race and planet.

Science can be utilized for the good of mankind, or for its demise. Human beings have looked to science to answer questions that were out of reach to mankind. We have been able to travel to the moon, stars, and beyond. We have been able to harvest the power of the sun’s energy through the utilization of oil, coal, natural gas, solar, wind, geothermal, and so much more. We have created machines that transport us at once unheard of speeds and created medicine that can cure the once incurable diseases that ravaged mankind. Yes, science has provided mankind with so many miraculous wonders. Unfortunately, there are some who have utilized science for much more sinister reasons. It has been used to create bombs, killing machines, and to create new diseases for the sole purpose of killing other humans. Now, global warming and climate change proponents utilize its name to distort reality and call for population control. They alter or manufacture data, exaggerate information, and create science fiction stories for the sole purpose of misleading humans into believing an unproven theory for the sole purpose of controlling them and implementing a one-world communist government.

To understand why climate change scientists are wrong, we simply have to look to the very same scientific principles that they purport to embrace. Science starts with a theory and involves taking specific steps to prove that theory. ‘Climate change’ is simply a theory that has not been proven. On the other hand, when you try to prove the basic science behind our environment, it disproves the climate change theory before you even get started. For example, we can look at the simple fact that human beings and other animals inhale oxygen (O2) and exhale carbon dioxide (CO2). Therefore, that goes along with the climate change proponents saying that limiting the number of human beings on the planet would throw our world into a toxic environment. But, if you look a bit closer, plants require carbon dioxide (CO2) to survive and they expel the oxygen (O2) that is required for the survival of animals and human beings. This creates a balance between the animal and plant world. That is one of the reasons that green plants are so important to the survival of our world, as it is. Conservationists have pushed for protecting our natural resources, including; plants, water, air, and other aspects of our ecosystem. It is a balance that enables us to live in harmony with the environment.

But, what happens when human beings outpace the number of plants; therefore, resulting in an overabundance of CO2 in the air? This is where scientific research comes into play. In ‘The Conversation,” a group of biologists by the name of Lowe and Sparrow studying the expansion of increased forestation around the globe learned that the greening of the earth was increasing in some of the world’s dryest places such as sub-Saharan Africa. As human beings increase in numbers, the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the air increases and plants thrive as a result. As plants thrive, the earth has been shown to be getting greener. The planet was designed to compensate for increased numbers of animals and humans. Our environment responds with increased vigorous plant life. As a result of increased greening, there has been increased consumption of carbon dioxide (CO2), and increased oxygen (O2) output by plants. This results in an equilibrium between plants and animals. Numerous studies have demonstrated the greening of the earth including studies by NASA, biologists Lowe and Sparrow, and numerous other scientists around the world.

As evidence of global greening has surfaced, global warming proponents utilized these facts to explain why they have changed their name from ‘global warming’ to ‘climate change’ proponents. They claim that global greening has decreased the temperatures of the planet. They say that the world’s plant population is growing and greening, and it will continue to do so until it reaches a precipice and a breaking point in our civilization. However, that theory really doesn’t support the facts either. If you look at science, plant life can only store a specific amount of carbon dioxide (CO2). Climate change proponents claim that plants will hit the breaking point when they cannot take in more CO2, but it would be like saying that human beings would hit the breaking point and could not take in any more oxygen (O2). We take in the required amount, and that is it. The only way to absorb more carbon dioxide would involve more plants and further greening.

God commanded that humans be fruitful and multiply, and he knew exactly what the ultimate plan was when he created the earth, and mankind which he intended to inhabit that earth. He created a planet that survives through a harmony of the plant and animal life. Humans throughout history have expanded and decreased in numbers, and the plant life has expanded and contracted in response. Mankind has increased in numbers, and decreased in numbers as well, due to disease, wars, natural disasters, and so forth. Today, we have hit the largest concentration of humans in history, but much of that growth is due to improvements in science, and the fact that we have been free of World Wars for over 70 years. A day will come when the human population will be reduced and plant life will contract in response.

‘Global warming,’ or ‘climate change’ are terms manufactured to strike fear into the world’s population. It is designed to manipulate humans into believing that they need the government to help save mankind from themselves. It is designed to make the population believe that the government should control how we spend our money, how much energy we utilize, how we run our businesses, and how we live our lives. In a nutshell, it gives the governments of the world control over our lives and the general population. It creates a ruling elitist class and those who are subservient to the elite. Our planet will survive no matter what population we achieve, and it will take man’s greed and thirst for power to destroy it. In the end, it will not be ‘climate change’ that destroys our planet. Instead, it will be the misguided betrayal of mankind towards God and all that he has created that will result in our planet’s destruction, and mankind’s ultimate demise.